Complaints represent a call to action for financial planners

financial ombudsman service financial planners financial planning storm financial global financial crisis financial planning practices federal court money management

5 October 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Financial planning companies and individual planners have been the subject of severe adverse findings by Financial Ombudsman Service panelists.

When the global financial crisis first hit Australia and investment returns headed south, it was predicted in Money Management that there would be an upturn in complaints against financial planners.

Recent adjudications by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) are a fulfillment of that prediction. Financial planning companies and individual planners have been the subject of severe adverse findings by FOS panelists, with the compensatory impacts nudging right up against the maximum $100,000.

Given the generally adverse publicity to which financial planners have been subjected to in recent months, it is just as well that the adjudications of the FOS are not widely published, because a number of panelists have been scathing in their assessment of how some planners have treated their clients.

However, the recent FOS adjudications should not be interpreted as providing cause for further harsh legislative or regulatory remedies.

Rather, they are proof that the existing system is working, albeit that there has been an upturn in the number of complaints.

Indeed, the upturn in the number of complaints should surprise no-one. Clients rarely find fault with their advisers when markets are rising and investment returns remain in positive territory.

While there are those who have sought to interpret precedents from some of the recent FOS adjudications, they are reaching.

At best, the recent FOS adjudications have simply reflected a proportionate exercise of the body’s powers. Nothing more, nothing less.

New ground will be broken if and when an aggrieved client decides to pursue action against a financial planner or a financial planning company in the law courts — something they are perfectly entitled to do and something which, if successful, would open the way for full compensatory damages.

While there has been much focus on ‘class actions’ with respect to the collapse of Storm Financial and the collapse of managed investment schemes, we have yet to witness the prosecution of a case in the jurisdiction offered by the state supreme courts or the Federal Court.

Dealer group heads, those running financial planning practices and individual financial planners would do well to log on to the FOS website and read the adjudications covering financial planning.

The future of the industry resides in the hands of planners themselves and how they choose to conduct themselves.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 2 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 2 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

4 days 15 hours ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

4 weeks ago