Bill Shorten's mega portfolio a reward for factional power

FOFA industry superannuation funds financial planning industry treasury

12 December 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The linking of Workplace Relations and Financial Services reflects factional clout rather than good governance.

Any links which exist between the Workplace Relations and Financial Services portfolios are tenuous at best, making the creation of Bill Shorten's new mega-portfolio more a case of political expediency and reward than good government.

While it had been widely speculated that Shorten would be elevated to the inner Cabinet and handed the Workplace Relations and Employment portfolio, only a very few people had suggested he might also retain responsibility for superannuation. No one had speculated he would retain financial services as a whole.

Industry diplomacy and policy reality mean few if any financial services spokesmen will be openly critical of what has happened but those who are honest will acknowledge it delivers few benefits for the industry and many deficits.

For one thing, at a time when the Productivity Commission ought to be reviewing default superannuation under modern awards an inherent conflict has been generated - one minister will be responsible for both superannuation and workplace relations.

For another thing, the same minister who has been viewed as altogether far too close to industry superannuation funds and, by definition the trade union movement, is now even closer to those two sources of influence.

And what does Shorten's multi-faceted responsibilities say about the influence of the Treasury on the future development of financial services policy? Indeed, what does Shorten's carve-out of a key part of the Treasury portfolio say about the influence of the Federal Treasurer, Wayne Swan?

No other Australian Treasurer has ever had key areas of their portfolio annexed in such a way.

A number of commentators yesterday noted Shorten's elevation to the inner-Cabinet as being a reward for his superior performance as a minister over the past 12 months.

However, any close examination of the manner in which he has handled some key policy issues suggests he is being flattered.

That Shorten is a person of factional influence who is crucial to the continuing leadership of Prime Minister, Julia Gillard is undeniable. However it would be wrong to suggest that his elevation in yesterday's Cabinet reshuffle is owed to anything other than the clout he derives from his Australian Labor Party factional and union allegiances.

The task confronting the financial planning industry in arguing its case for a more workable Future of Financial Advice outcome has just become a little bit harder.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 days 17 hours ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 week 1 day ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 1 week ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

3 weeks 4 days ago

The corporate regulator has named its new chief executive, who is set to replace retiring interim CEO Greg Yanco in March....

3 weeks 1 day ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS