ASIC comes out of the shadows

financial-planning-industry/compliance/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/industry-super-network/industry-superannuation-funds/chairman/financial-planners/

19 March 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

So the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) intends to conduct another financial planning shadow shopping exercise some time after June 30, this year — meaning there will have been a two-year gap between such efforts on the part of the regulator.

No one in the financial planning industry should be surprised by the ASIC action. The regulator made clear last year that such an exercise would be scheduled, not least because it was something supported by the then newly-elected Rudd Labor Government.

Equally unsurprising should have been the fact that the first organisation to comment on the 2009-10 ASIC shadow shop was the Industry Super Network, with its executive manager, David Whitely, calling on the regulator to extend its efforts beyond simple compliance to whether advice is being provided in the ‘best interests’ of the client.

Of course, the environment in which the shadow shop is conducted will be very different to that which existed in 2005 and 2006. Investment returns have collapsed and as our front-page story reveals, financial planners are feeling extreme stress.

If the shadow shopping exercise is to have any meaning at all, it must traverse the entire financial planning industry, and that includes planners working for or on behalf of industry superannuation funds. Perhaps, too, the regulator’s shadow shoppers could try sampling the efforts of some of the call centre ‘advisers’ to whom super fund members are referred when they ask to transfer their balances into cash.

What ASIC ought to understand is that the financial planning industry has evolved since its last shadow shopping exercise and fund-related planners represent a significant part of that evolution. Connection to an industry fund does not carry with it impunity from appropriate regulatory oversight.

ASIC under the leadership of chairman Michael D’Aloisio is a less abrasive organisation than the body that was led by his predecessor, Jeff Lucy. It is to be hoped, on that basis, that the regulator adopts a more measured approach to any enforcement action evolving out of the shadow shopping exercise.

For this latest shadow shopping exercise to have legitimacy it must focus on compliance, not political agendas.

By Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

6 days 16 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

3 weeks ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5