Abandon funds management to add value
I haveasked dozens of financial planners where they add value to their clients. Their usual response is through advice and strategy.
Ask these same financial planners what they cover in their review processes, and most continue to focus on the investments, including fund manager monitoring, selection and recommended changes, blending, economic updates and so forth — clearly focusing on where the value add is not.
Why do so many financial planners continue down this path? Is it that they are scared of change? Is it that they don’t have the systems in place to provide the value add through advice and strategy? Perhaps some feel value is added in the investment process.
My view is that far too many planners are trying to re-invent the wheel.
Original thought in routine situations is inefficient and exhausting. That’s the view of Paul Etheridge, a pioneer of the financial planning industry in the UK. The point Etheridge makes, is many planners still tend to think of themselves primarily as technicians, and try to re-invent or fix the wheel when it’s not actually broken.
By contrast, a planner who follows Etheridge’s logic and takes a more entrepreneurial view (focusing on how to maximise business value), would be more likely to use the wheel that has already been invented, so long as it delivered the result required.
Entrepreneurs recognise opportunity cost, and know that time spent re-inventing products or processes could be much better spent on things that deliver greater value to the business.
This simple business concept — efficient allocation of time and resources — is true for all industries. The time that financial planners spend researching, constructing, implementing, maintaining and communicating unique portfolios could be much better spent.
This is especially true when you recognise you could outsource complete portfolio construction to an expert research team, and access a range of efficiently engineered, fully implemented and fully maintained client portfolios.
Take this test. Make a list of all the investment holdings you’ve accumulated across your entire client base. (Remember, you may end up with numerous different products and portfolios from any one fund manager over time.) If you have been in the game for 10 years or more, and you use traditional retail and discretionary systems across a sizeable client base, you will struggle to stay under 100 different holdings.
How many different client portfolios do you need? I believe it should be between two and 10. In reality, it’s probably somewhere in the middle, with the majority of clients fitting nicely into a balanced or growth portfolio.
But do your clients with the same risk/return profile hold the same portfolio? Does your 1994 growth client hold the same basket of assets and managers as the growth client you met last month? If you are using traditional retail and discretionary portfolio implementation systems, then the answer is probably no.
The irony of this situation is that in many cases the portfolio and planning outcomes for the client could actually be improved if the portfolios were outsourced to specialists who engineer and re-engineer portfolios all day, every day.
Of course, outsourcing portfolio management is not appropriate for every client. My experience suggests 75 per cent of clients are comfortable with delegating investment decisions.
You need to ask yourself if the traditional retail or discretionary approach to portfolio implementation and management is holding you back.
What is the cost of this complexity and reduced capacity to the value of your business? Are customised portfolios (or even standardised portfolios not systematically implemented and maintained) creating downstream maintenance hassles inhibiting the growth or saleability of your business?
Would outsourcing portfolios help you deliver a more complete planning service to your clients?
Would outsourcing the construction of portfolios allow you to take a more direct role in communicating the details and benefits of your clients’ portfolios, tracking portfolio progress against benchmarks, sending out stock stories or insights into the asset mix, and manager combinations to inspire greater client confidence and loyalty?
Would outsourcing portfolios let you build more profitable and sustainable ongoing relationships with your clients, filling the roles of coach, financial planner and manager?
Would you have more time to help your clients set financial and lifestyle goals, and to help motivate and discipline them to achieve those goals?
The potential to transform your business by outsourcing portfolio implementation and management is profound.
David Haintz is the director of Haintz FinancialServices.
Recommended for you
Join us for a special episode of Relative Return Unplugged as hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford are joined by shadow financial services minister Luke Howarth to discuss the Coalition’s goals for financial advice.
In this special episode of Relative Return Unplugged, we are sharing a discussion between Momentum Media’s Steve Kuper, Major General (Ret’d) Marcus Thompson and AMP chief economist Shane Oliver on the latest economic data and what it means for Australia’s economy and national security.
In this episode of Relative Return Unplugged, co-hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford break down some of the legislation that passed during the government’s last-minute guillotine motion, including the measures to restructure the Reserve Bank into a two-board system.
In this episode of Relative Return Unplugged, co-hosts Maja Garaca Djurdjevic and Keith Ford are joined by Money Management editor Laura Dew to dissect some of the submissions that industry stakeholders have made to the Senate’s Dixon Advisory inquiry.
