Don’t wait for Govt on CIPRs
Superannuation funds should be acting to get ahead of the Federal Government’s timetable with respect to developing post-retirement products, according to an implementation specialist with Parametric Portfolio Associates.
Parametric’s chief investment officer, Paul Bouchey, said it was superannuation funds which should be setting the pace, not the Government.
“Although superannuation funds can follow the Government’s legislative timetable to develop a Comprehensive Income Product for Retirement (CIPR) by 1 July, 2022, that’s hardly an optimal outcome for fund members who have retired or are making retirement plans now,” he said. “They want a timetable dictated by their needs – not Government legislation.
“It will require superannuation funds to ‘get over’ the powerful anchoring bias of an accumulation mindset to design good solutions for retired members and members in retirement-planning phase.”
Parametric Australia managing director, Raewyn Williams, agreed with Bouchey’s analysis saying superannuation funds should not consider developing CIPRs as a chore but, rather, an opportunity.
Bouchey and Williams said that although there was keen debate about the use of annuities (or other innovative longevity risk pooling solutions) in a CIPR, superannuation funds should not be distracted from thinking about clever ways their CIPR or other retirement solution could achieve their equity exposure.
“Certainly, it’s clear that the investments backing a CIPR will need to have some exposure to equities or other growth assets,” Bouchy said. “Superannuation funds should be looking now for different approaches, such as specific defensive or low volatility strategies and factor-based strategies that use simple construction rules to produce better-than-market income and volatility outcomes.
“Other equity options include emerging markets strategies with good downside risk properties and Australian equity strategies that recognise the value of franking credits to retirees as an additional source of yield while addressing the risks of simplistic franking-tilted approaches.”
Williams suggested that, structurally, superannuation funds should also think about whether segregating their pension assets from their accumulation assets – at least for some asset classes – makes sense.
Recommended for you
The rise of private credit funds is giving research houses cause for concern about their viability for retail and wholesale investors and necessitating changes to their research process.
The rebranding of the AMP advice division to Akumin brings to an end a 176-year history for the firm and provides a fresh start for advisers under Entireti.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
Commentators say the lack of transparency in private markets is making it difficult for fund managers and advisers to assess them from an ESG perspective.
