Independent directors may undermine democratic process

superannuation funds ASFA super funds association of superannuation funds

28 August 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

There is no evidence to suggest that structural independence improves superannuation funds' financial positions or board directors' decision-making, according to a senior academic at Queens University in Belfast.  

He statement comes as the Coalition has signalled it will revisit the issue of super funds' board structures and seek to impose a requirement for three independent directors. 

Speaking at an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) luncheon, Queens University's head of school at its faculty of law, Professor Sally Wheeler, said structural tests of independence may produce boards that are separate from interpersonal or business parties, but it may not lead to the kind of behavioural independence its proponents seek. 

The gender diversity argument had sprung from a failure of structural independence, Wheeler said. 

"There's real confusion there I think between independent ideas and thinking and independence as an identity, and what we want surely is independent ideas and thinking rather than people who have independence as some sort of identity," she said. 

"You're trying to solve a demographic deficit argument with issues about cognitive skills and behavioural attributes and that just doesn't work." 

According to Wheeler, research on psychological and group decision-making show that structural independence may actually work against behavioural attributes of independence. 

Debates around policies and procedures and interpretation of facts - 'task conflict' in psychology - is a good thing in decision-making but is being phased out by structural independence, she said. 

"It's trying to get rid of people who have values and shared norms; however research from psycghology tells us that actually you get much more discursive, teased-out decision-making if you have exactly those groups," Wheeler said. 

Group members are more likely to raise ideas and discuss different opinions because it is deemed appropriate or safe. 

Groups that lacked social cohesion are prone to relationship conflict, she said, which had a negative effect on the performance of groups. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 1 week ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 2 weeks ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

2 weeks 2 days ago