Will bank staff be mistaken for advisers?

ABA advisers banks staff personal advice Government's design and distribution laws the Australian Banking Association banking the Senate Economics Legislation committee Treasury Laws Amendments design and distribution obligations product intervention powers DDOs financial products

23 October 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Bank employees may be misconstrued by customers has giving personal advice unless there is greater clarity injected into the Government’s Design and Distribution laws, according to the Australian Banking Association (ABA).

The ABA has used a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee’s review of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Design and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention Powers) Bill 2018 to restate that real risks exist of bank customers becoming confused by the design and distribution obligations (DDOs).

“To comply with the DDO and determine whether a consumer falls within a target market, distributors will need to take steps to understand the consumer’s circumstances,” it said. “In taking these steps, there is a risk that consumers will come to believe that (or, at least, be confused as to whether) the supply of the financial product has been made as a result of the consideration of their individual circumstances and is thus akin to receiving personal advice.”

It said customers might believe that because they had been supplied the financial product, a conclusion had been reached that it was appropriate for their unique circumstances, rather than because their circumstances matched those of the target market.

“This requires consumers to be able to discern between supplies of financial product on the basis of the DDO and supplies that are based on personal advice,” the submission said.

The submission also warned that to clarify the situation, staff would likely need to ask questions of customers about their personal circumstances, financial situation or needs and therefore risk being reach of other elements of the law.

“However, the client may also be left believing that their personal circumstances have been taken account of for purposes other than simply determining whether they fit the relevant target market determination,” it said.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

11 hours 22 minutes ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

11 hours 27 minutes ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

1 day 6 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND