Banks defend vertical integration

banks vertical integration big four conflicts of interest ABA australian banking association Senate Economics Legislation Committee bank integration wealth management demerger regulatory intervention Royal Commission RC financial system inquiry FSI productivity commission PC banking system reform separation of banks

10 April 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Australia’s major banks have rejected the notion of enforced structural separation as a means of dealing with conflicts of interest arising out of vertical integration.

The Australian Banking Association (ABA) has used a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee to both reject a push for enforced structural separation and to defend the virtues of “bank integration”.

What is more, the ABA submission has pointed to recent moves by the major banks in the wealth management area as proof of their willingness to unilaterally simplify and demerge their businesses.

“Bank integration can enhance competition and provide economies of scale that reduce the prices of products and services offered to customers,” the ABA submission said. “Integration allows customers the choice of having a single relationship with their financial institution and this can be tailored to meet the needs of that individual, leading to more innovative products and services.”

“While some customers choose to have relationships with different institutions, others prefer to deal with one institution. The market should be able to offer this choice and shouldn’t be hindered by such radical regulatory intervention, which is at odds with the findings of the Royal Commission, the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) and the Productivity Commission (PC).”

“ABA members have different strategies in relation to the range of services they offer and the extent of vertical integration in their business. Some members are taking steps to simplify their businesses and sell or demerge some of their vertically integrated structures. Banks should retain the flexibility to determine these strategies in the future.”

The Senate Economics Legislation Committee has been taking submissions responding to the Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019 which is being pursued by the Pauline Hanson One Nation Party.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

2 days 12 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

2 days 12 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

3 days 7 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND