ASIC makes first civil DDO action against financial product distributor
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced its first civil penalty action against a distributor of financial products in the Federal Court for alleged breaches of the design and distribution obligations (DDO).
Firstmac Limited distributed term deposits and other investment products, including interests in Firstmac High Livez (High Livez), a registered managed investment scheme.
ASIC alleged that in marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, Firstmac failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the product was distributed in accordance with the target market determination.
ASIC also alleged in its action that Firstmac sent High Livez material to 817 Firstmac term deposit customers between 5 October, 2021 and 9 September, 2022.
By adopting a cross-selling strategy of marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, there was a likelihood that those customers would be outside the High Livez target market, because:
- Unlike Firstmac’s term deposits which were guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government in the amount up to $250,000 per account, High Livez was not a capital guaranteed product. The TMD indicated that customers seeking a capital guarantee were not in the target market; and
- The investment timeframes for term deposits ranged from 30 days to two years whereas the recommended investment timeframe for High Livez was a minimum of three years up to five years. The TMD indicated that customers seeking an investment timeframe of two years or less were not in the target market.
ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court, said: “ASIC is concerned that Firstmac’s term deposit customers were exposed to the risk that they might obtain a financial product that was not appropriate to their needs and objectives.
“Under the DDO, issuing and distributing financial products now requires a consumer-first mindset with genuine consideration of the likely objectives, financial situation and needs of consumers being targeted.”
ASIC was seeking declarations and pecuniary penalties from the Court.
Recommended for you
T. Rowe Price believes Australian growth is successfully managing to shrug off consumer weakness, but the firm’s multi-asset team is not yet positive enough to increase its underweight position.
Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made by an alleged threat actor, following a cyber incident last weekend.
The latest budget papers have outlined a $10 million provision for ASIC greenwashing enforcement activity as well as funds for a sustainable labelling regime to be partially met by industry levies.
Betashares has expanded its fixed income solutions with the launch of a new ETF offering exposure to subordinated bonds issued by the big four Australian banks.
Add new comment