AICD wants broader definition of ‘independent directors’ for super funds

funds management independent directors

19 October 2015
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) has backed legislation for independent directors to be appointed to super funds, but wants the definition to be consistent with other APRA-regulated entities.

In a submission to the Senate Economic Legislation Committee, AICD chief executive, John Brogden, said the definition proposed in the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, was overly "prescriptive".

"As noted in our previous submission to Treasury the exposure draft the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, it is our long-held view that, greater independence on the boards of superannuation trustee companies should be encouraged, consistent with internationally recognised principles of good governance," he said.

"Our submission recommended that a broader definition of ‘independent' be adopted under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) for directors of superannuation trustee companies, similar to the one that is used for the purposes of Principle 2 under the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, namely: ‘an independent director is a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with — or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with — the independent exercise of their judgement.

"We would again ask that consideration be given to including a broader definition in the Bill and that specific examples of the relationships that will be considered by APRA to impact a director's independence be included in the relevant Prudential Standard.

"Not only would this approach be consistent with the approach taken for all other financial entities regulated by APRA, including the detail in the Prudential Standard will mean that they can be more easily changed as corporate governance practice evolves, as opposed to legislation."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS