Lack of awareness on smart beta
There is a lack of awareness amongst majority of financial planners around smart beta despite the desire for some active exposure in exchange traded funds (ETFs), according to Investment Trends.
Research director, Recep Peker told Money Management only 17 per cent of financial planners said they were familiar with the concept of smart beta.
“So if the majority of the planner population is not aware of something they can’t get excited about it,” he said.
Quoting a 2016 study on ETFs by Investment Trends, Peker said the number one barrier to using ETFs was that planners and investors wanted some active exposure.
“That is a bit of an opportunity to educate the market on what smart beta is and how it can be used in place of actively managed funds,” Peker said.
The other major barrier to using ETFs was accessibility. While planners were accredited to advise on and recommend the investment vehicle, they said it was difficult to access on approved product lists (APLs) and some platforms.
“So they're saying they want to recommend it [but] they just don’t have the means of recommending it yet,” Peker said.
Head of ETF Securities Australia, Kris Walesby said most advisers thought of it as a yield fund rather than smart beta, which he said they understood well.
However, he said advisers lacked an understanding of more complex strategies such as option-based strategies to attempt to harvest dividends.
“Maybe that’s not understood because it’s more complex and the outcome is non-standard. As soon as you start going into derivatives and things like that the outcomes are not necessarily linear and that’s getting a bit complex.”
Walesby added the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had ensured smart beta ETFs on offer in Australia were simple and easy to understand.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
