CBA pays $29m for poor advice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c519/6c519cd119a3150efdb6b2e51cc528c872b6795c" alt="Australian money image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c519/6c519cd119a3150efdb6b2e51cc528c872b6795c" alt="Australian money image"
The Commonwealth Bank (CBA) has paid over $29 million to over 2,100 cases as part of its Open Advice Review Program (OARP) for clients affected by poor advice received from Commonwealth Financial Planning or Financial Wisdom between 1 September 2003 and 1 July 2012.
CBA executive general manager, Leif Gamertsfelder said around 90 per cent of the cases had been finalised.
“We continue to make sure our dedicated team is available to assist customers or their independent customer advocate to answer any questions about the cases that are currently being finalised,” he said.
According to the Promontory Financial Group seventh and final report released today on the OARP, $29.11 million was paid to 2,186 cases. Of that amount, $22.98 million was paid to 1,641 cases. The bank said it would continue to finalise payments where offers had been made but not finalised.
A total of 8,654 cases were issued an assessment outcome, of which 7,515 had been finalised and closed after the customer had either accepted his/her assessment outcome or withdrawn from the program either because they had rejected the outcome or had not responded.
A total of 1,076 cases were found to have received poor or incorrectly implemented advice which resulted in financial loss for the customer, while 434 cases were charged incorrect fees, but the related advice was found to have been appropriate and did not cause financial loss to the customer.
Through the life of the program, the bank has retrieved an advice file for 8,618 of the 10,128 registered cases in the program, which left 842 cases where no advice file was retrieved. In these cases the bank had to apply alternative assessment processes to deal with those cases.
Where one critical advice document was available for review which suggested advice may have been provided on other occasions but no critical advice documents were available, bank assessors had to consider any information available on file to identify potential instances of advice, and then assess the customer’s attitude to risk known to the adviser to reach a conclusion.
The bank also used data analytics on customer transactions data to identify potential instances of advice.
A total of 22,797 customers expressed interest in the program, and 8,654 customers requested a review of their advice.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.